In our new “how can we help you?” thread, a reader writes:
What are the norms now on citing SEP entries? I was once told never to cite it, but I’ve now seen a few published articles which do. If a particularly useful SEP entry is one citation among many, would anyone bat an eye?
One person noted in a follow-up comment that they cite the SEP regularly and it has never been a problem for them. I suspect it may only be a problem if SEP entries make up most or all of one’s references, in which case it may look like one hasn’t really researched the area.
What do other readers think?
This is just about personal judgements, but I don’t think I’m alone in thinking that the papers published in the…